Farah Fawcett is dead. The 1970’s blond bimbo Charlie’s Angels teevee star who transformed herself at mid career into a talented actress has died of a disease so horrible I’m almost glad I had never heard of it: Anal cancer that spread to other vital organs. This type of cancer has a high correlation with the human pappilloma virus, HPV. To the Phyllis Schlafly’s of the world Farah Fawcett’s life and death must look scandalous.
That is why Ms. Fawcett’s death is a feminist issue.
For the right wing there are just two possibilities for women: Conventional man-on-top marriage or disease, disgrace and death. Take your pick.
A couple of years ago there was talk of immunizing girls against the risks of HPV caused cervical cancer with Guardasil, a Merck product. “Defenders” of the “family” such as Phyllis Schlafly contend that HPV can only be contracted from an unchaste, and presumably unmarried, partner. Therefore, as expected, the religious right concealed its true anti sex education agenda with claims that Guardasil was bad for women’s health. It put forward its usual antidote for all issues sexual. Here’s what Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Forum had to add to the conversation on HPV:
A 100% effective means of protection against … diseases is freely available, and it is abstinence (emphasis mine).
This abstinence only proscription dealing with disease has also produced painful results in Africa, where religious zealots Rick Warren and Pat Robinson deliver the Gospel, dramatically increasing the HIV/AIDS rate among women, obliged to have sexual relations with their infected men.
The religious right fought convenient contraception and the post-coital drug RU 486 on health grounds as well. But their real aim is obvious. Read the language describing the action of the drug:
That initial action causes the lining of the uterus to release the embryonic child. A second drug, known as misoprostol, is taken two days after mifepristone and causes the uterus to contract, expelling the baby, (emphasis mine).
Much of the “abortion” debate is cloaked in concern for health issues such as this alarm over FDA inspections in China:
We do know that Shanghai is the sole supplier to the United States of the abortion pill, Mifepristone, known as RU-486. The FDA had previously concealed the source of RU-486…
Free trade is not only bringing us contaminated drugs and foods, but soon could bring us the products of embryonic stem cell transfers (aka cloning).
Does Phyllis oppose free trade and globalization or just stem cell research? Hard to figure.
The religious right’s argument in favor of abstinence also permeates their position against sex discrimination and animates much prejudice against public school curricula, the teaching of evolutionary and biological science, as well as other “socialistic” subjects.
For the far right-
Marriage=sex=children=happiness=private enterprise=the controlling formula in the “choice” debate. Here is Phyllis making the case for marriage+capitalism at all costs. That’s why female conservatives fought and beat the ERA:
Another theory could be the increase in easy divorce and illegitimacy (now 40 percent of American births are to single moms), which means that millions of women are raising kids without a husband and therefore expect Big Brother government to substitute as provider. The 2008 election returns showed that 70 percent of unmarried women voted for Barack Obama, perhaps hoping to be beneficiaries of his “spread the wealth” policies…..
In the pre-1970 era, when surveys showed women with higher levels of happiness, most men held jobs that enabled their wives to be fulltime homemakers. The private enterprise system constantly produces goods that make household work and kiddie care easier (such as dryers, dishwashers and paper diapers).
Here’s a FOX channel video of Phyllis speaking about the defeat of the ERA:
I don’t know whose universe she’s living in (yes, I do) but there is no boundary here between sex and capitalism, with comfortable, stay-at-home women the consumers, and you know who running the world.
There is plenty of talk about women putting aside differences over abortion to form a neutral voting block that can simply advocate for women’s rights. That sounds good. But among other non-starter stumbling blocks on the road to non-partisan kumbaya (such as just about everything) is the barricade that must never be surrendered, choice.
Choice isn’t just Rove v. Wade. Reproductive choice for women is the sine qua non of other choices: to be married or not; to have sex or not; to go to work or not; to have a career or not; to accept bad treatment within a relationship or not. The prevalence of unmarried women in the workplace has removed much of the stigma associated with divorce, Lesbianism and the terrible shame once known as “spinsterhood”.
What the religious right opposes is not just “choice”, it’s choices. That’s clear.
I wonder what Phyllis Schlafly would have to say about Farrah Fawcett.